Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Wraping up

Answering Questions

I'm sure that somewhere in all my ramblings I have covered the questions posed by Prof. Marsteller but I thought I should go through and try to get the ideas organized.

1. Where might you find a more complete description of their research?

The Internet truly is amazing. I found that one of the best places to find out about my scientist's research is her website. Her page has a statement of her research interests, a few citations of publications (no links) and links to her lab and personal web page.

The monkey lab page is much more extensive than the short bio page. Here she has posted bios of all her lab assistants, descriptions of their current research, a list of publications with PDF links, and links to other labs and her field stations.

Also linked from her main web page is her personal page. This is very similar to the monkey lab page. Here she posts publication links (some with PDF links but not as up to date as the monkey lab site), short bios of the Comparative Cognition Laboratory workers (graduate students mostly), and this is also where her CV is posted.

Investigating this site and the links alone would give anyone interested in this type of work a wealth of information.

2. Can you see any patterns in their literature use?

Dr. Santos has cited publications related to cognition both human and animal, animal science and behavior, psychology, brain science, language, and human development. From my brief survey of her publications for this assignment it seems she cites "Cognition" and "Animal Behavior" quite a bit.


3. Would they serendipitously scan for ideas? Where?

If she scans for ideas it would probably be form journals that are related to her research but that do not directly cover it, such as some of the human development journals. Because she is interested in the evolution of cognition and psychology reviewing the work of scientists that deals with infants and children could lead to interesting insight to non-human research. Also, Dr. Santos is on the editorial board of at least one on-line publication and she lists many publications for which she is an ad hoc reviewer; these too would serve as sources for idea discovery.

4. Where might they systematically look for information?

It is probably in the journals that she cites more frequently that Dr. Santos looks systematically for information. While I couldn't find which organizations to which she has membership it would be very unlikely that she does not belong to any. I'm sure she receives newsletters, publications and even list-serve e-mails from these associations. I know she attends conferences as her CV lists papers she has presented at conferences such as the International Primatological Society and the International Conference On Comparative Cognition. She probably also looks at the research her colleagues are publishing via their web sites.

5. Are there interdisciplinary aspects to their work? If so, how would this complicate their information seeking behavior?

In Dr Santos' own words
My research explores the evolutionary origins of the human mind by comparing the cognitive abilities of human and non-human primates. It provides an interface between evolutionary biology, developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. My experiments focus on non-human primates (in captivity and in the field) incorporating methodologies from cognitive development, animal learning psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.

While these are related fields anyone exploring the evolution of cognition would have to keep appraised of research being done with humans and non-humans. An information seeker would also have to look in journals that deal with the physical structure of the brain as well as behavior patterns.

6. Is there a possibility that their work pulls information from sub-disciplines or disciplines that have historically been working somewhat in isolation from one another?

I'm not sure how disparate these would be but I noticed that Dr. Santos' work in cognition pulls from research done in sub-disciplines such as language acquisition, child development and primate behavior. I would guess that these fields are not entirely isolated from one another but do overlap to some degree.

7. Is there any evidence that they participate in some form of social (computerized or otherwise) networking – especially ones where they are exchanging information with colleagues?

I did not find any direct evidence of social networking, however Dr. Santos has links on her web page to many of her colleagues web-pages (both at Yale and other institutions), has co-written many papers, and as mentioned above has presented papers at conferences.

8. Are the journals, or other information that they are citing, open access?
Dr. Santos cites journals that are both open access and publisher restricted.

Many of the journals cited are published by the APA. APA journals are available free on their web site -

Some of the other journals she cites are from publishers such as Elsevier which allow the author to archive pre- and post-publication; these type of articles may be available on sites such as PubMed, a personal web page like Dr. Santos' own, or a university repository. But many times this type of archiving can be difficult to discover, part of the "hidden web".

Recommendations

If I were asked by a patron to help with research in this field, after my initial moment of panic, I would probably start them off with an EBSCO search using PsycARTICLES, Psychology & Behavioral Sciences Collection, PsycINFO, Medline, Philosopher's Index, and Biological Abstracts. If we were not in a library with access to those EBSCO options I might start them off with a Google Scholar search. I would also suggest looking at APA's offerings. While we were exploring one of those options I would calm down and remember how helpful PubMed can be and direct the patron there as well. Once the patron found a some useful articles I would suggest checking the authors in the ISI to see who is frequently cited; this would give the patron an idea of who's work is being most widely read by others in the field. I would also encourage them to look for authors' web sites. If the patron was not just doing one research paper but really planned to delve into the field, I would also suggest setting up a "comprehensive" Google news alert (scanning regular news, blogs, groups, etc.) with keywords such as "primate cognition" and "evolutionary psychology".

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Open Access, PubMed, PLoS and Sherpa

Professor Marsteller gave me a lot to think about in the last lecture, particularly on the topic of open access.

I notices other classmates mentioned being able to link to published work from their scientist's CV; I was not so lucky. However, Dr. Santos does have some PDF files of her articles on her website. The most current citation is from 2003. She really needs to update as I know from database searches she has published work up to at least the end of 2008. It is this type of personal or academic archived work that I used to think of as open access. I was unaware that there were entire databases and even journals that published as OA.

What an "Ah-ha" moment when I explored PubMed. Why didn't I know about this before? This is an amazing resource and I will be spreading the word. I was on this site for hours. It has lots of links and I especially like the related articles function. To know that this is available to the general public is great. Many articles are even available full text. Someone without access to an academic library can still find information and if it is not freely available the patron can try to get it on Inter-library Loan.
Of course I did a search for my scientist and came up with many articles that I found on the academic databases but when I limited my results to full text articles I only got two hits. I did find that the limit to full text did not extend to the related articles feature. But it is fairly easy to pick them out due to the green Free article link under the citation.

Another good resource I explored is the PLoS, Public Library of Science. They publish seven fully open access peer-reviewed journals. They also "deposit" works in PubMed upon publication. They offer RSS feeds to help researchers stay up to date. One of their publications, PLoS Computational Biology, is an official journal of the International Society for Computational Biology and includes Dr. Santos on the editorial board.

Sherpa/RoMEO is a great way to find which publishers support open access. I found it a little difficult to navigate at first because I wasn't sure how this site might be used. I can see if someone wants to advance the open access agenda that they would want to find out which publications support open access. But it really didn't click until I read that some grants would require the author to also have their research available in an open access venue; such as an NIH's requirement that grant recipients submit their work to PubMed. I did look at Dr. Santo's CV to see if any of her grants may have had this sort of requirement but even after poking around for quite a while I couldn't determine this.

Sunday, February 15, 2009

dead ends, frustrations and getting the hang of ISI

Well I've been pretty frustrated this week. Hoping to get some suggestions from this week's lectures I popped into ISI. I actually have access to Science Citation Index from work and I tried it at the suggestion of one of my co-workers but had no luck. I thought I would try again to see if maybe I would have more success after exploring with short assignment two. Still nothing.

Luckily I decided to download "Publish or Perish". I found many articles by my scientist have indeed been cited. It seems that in the ISI databases she is Santos LR (first initial, middle initial) and not Santos LA* (truncated first name) as I assumed. I didn't even discover this when I tried the ISI author search function as I was looking for her full name alphabetically (silly library student). I should have known from Prof. Marsteller's anecdote about the Google Scholar and his discovery that his name was being misspelled.

Google Scholar is another spot I checked out a while ago but didn't feel like I had much success with. I didn't notice the name listing only that the articles I came up with were pretty much what I found in my library search and with many I couldn't access the full text as I could with the library finds. When I finally had the name thing figured out I discovered that yes my scientist has been cited. In fact several of her articles have be cited upwards of 20 times. Although she did not show up in the Researcher ID area or Essential Science Indicators. Maybe I'm doing something wrong there too?

One of the features that I think would be of particular interest to someone new to the field would be the "related records" function. If you start from one article not only can you go backward and forward with citations but you can also find articles that would most likely be related to your starting point through shared citations. Most likely if the new article is citing similar work the topic and focus of the paper will also be similar. In this way you can see what others in the field are doing.

Doing the citation search also yields possible subject headings. For my search on Laurie Santos the articles were tagged in 18 different subject area. Having looked at many of her articles through EBSCO I knew I could exclude several such as Tropical Medicine and Public, Environmental and Occupational Health. However, if I had not known that Dr. Santos most recent writing focused on the economic behavior of non-human primates I would have excluded the Economics area. I would suggest to any new explorer to check unusual subject areas in case a scientist has branched out or who's work may be multidisciplinary. These unusual subject areas may lead to unanticipated resources.

Saturday, February 7, 2009

professional organizations and associations

This week I feel like I hit a bit of a road block. I finally decided revisit Dr. Santos’ CV and analyze her connections to professional organizations. All professions have related organizations and because academic fields are focused on exploring and sharing ideas they have more than commercial fields. Many of the publications that have published Dr. Santos’ work have related associations. Membership in organizations such as this includes such benefits as newsletters, job listings, and membership directories. Every organization that I looked into offers lower membership dues for students. Most of the organizations also host conferences. They also have websites, many of which have information and links open to all. These would be good places for someone new to the field to explore. The main problem would be choosing which organizations to join.


Of course the American Psychological Association is the largest and most well known of the organizations and they publish a laundry list of journals as well as books and videos. Their website is quite extensive with a separate area for students, lists of conferences, news feeds, career information and more. It has a lot of interesting information for even a layperson such as me.


It is interesting to note that the list of publications on which Dr. Santos has been an ad hoc reviewer is longer than the list in which she has been published and includes titles that seem to fall a little outside her main research focus. I’m sure that reading slightly outside her discipline has sparked ideas. As I mentioned last time there is a leaning to child and infant behavior, cognition and psychology.


Almost all of Dr. Santos’ speaking engagements have been at university sponsored lecture series and Colloquia. One association that is listed as hosting a meeting is the Society for Philosophy and Psychology. This organization is fairly inexpensive to join, hosts two list-serves, one for association news and another with info about other conferences and calls for papers from organizations that may be of interest to members. However it has no associated publications.


Publications that have published Dr. Santos’ work and their related associations:

  • Animal Behaviour – Animal Behavior Society
  • Developmental Psychology – American Psychological Association
  • Journal of Comparative Psychology – American Psychological Association
  • Cognitive Science – Cognitive Science Society

Publications for which Dr. Santos has been an ad hoc reviewer and their associations:

  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences – Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • Child Development – Society for Research in Child Development
  • Child Development Perspectives – Society for Research in child Development
  • Infancy – International Society on Infant Studies

Saturday, January 31, 2009

Where she's been published and conference exploration

1/28

I went back to EBSCO to review where Laurie Santos has published and some of the publications she cited in her work. I used the basic Academic Search Complete and I limited my search to Academic Journals. I know that she has been included in some popular publications such as Discovery and Smithsonian magazines and these can be some good places for sparking ideas but the more academic journals provide details on research that would be invaluable to someone new to the field. Titles citing Laurie Santos as author include Developmental Science and Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. I decided to expand the search to include psychology databases: PsycINFO, PsychARTICLES and Psychology and Behavioral Science Collection. This only yielded two more publications: Animal Cognition, and Developmental Science. I find that she was listed as editor for a few publications such as Infancy, and Child Development.

Looking back at her web pages this connection to child development is not a surprise. Laurie Santos's list of published works includes entries in such journals as Infancy, Developmental Science, Cognition and Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. On the monkey-lab site her student assistants have short bios, many of whom list an interest in both infant/child cognition and non-human primate cognition. It makes sense that someone who wants to understand the evolution of thought would look for parallels between young humans and non-human primates. It reminds me of documentaries I have seen that compare language use and understanding in chimps that have been taught sign language and young humans.

Other journals that have published Dr. Santos's work are Current Biology and, Journal of Political Economy. This second seems a little unusual until the focus of her more current work is considered. As I stated in an earlier post her most current experiments deal with the economic behavior of non-human primates.

I spent quite a lot of time trying to find mention of Laurie Santos presenting at a conference. Using a Google scholar search I came up with some hits that mention some conferences such as the Bi-Annual Meeting of the International Conference on Infant...(this was cut off and I couldn't access more from the link) and the 21st Annual Boston U. Conference on Language. However, these links were difficult to follow as many led to proprietary sites like Elsiver and JSTOR.

Next I tried just looking for related conferences. This became a little overwhelming. I found a site that was a kind of general listing of academic conferences - Conference Alerts. This site is broken up into disciplines. I don't have much faith in this site. I think the listings are very extensive, there don't seem to be enough. If fact I tried one I know, CAAS, Classical Association of Atlantic States, and it was not listed. I was starting to feel at a loss.

Luckily I went back to Dr. Santos's Yale web page and found a link to her CV. When I tried to access this before I was blocked but I must have be trying from a different page. None of the earlier possible conferences were listed on her CV. So it looks like my time on Google looking for a link between Dr. Santos and conferences was wasted. Dr. Santos also list many lists many events at which she was an invited speaker. There seems to be many symposiums, lecture series and other events in addition to conferences that would be great sources of information and inspiration to anyone interested in the same field of research.

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

the Clusty experience

Sunday I decided to take Prof. Marsteller's suggestion to visit the Clusty search site. A simple name search yielded some Yale Daily News articles which provided some clues. One article was an profile piece in which Laurie Santos says she hopes to start teaching classes in behavioral biology and evolutionary psychology. The fact that many of her monkey's at Harvard were names after former Yale psychologists; indicating, I'm sure, some of her idols or influences. The article also states the focus of her work as the evolution of human cognition and the mental capabilities of monkeys and other non-human primates. But this I already knew from her web pages.

Another resource uncovered by my Clusty search is Psych Central, a mental health social network. Laurie was quoted in a few articles here. I wonder if she would participate in this type of social network. It seems a little removed from her primary work but may be a source of inspiration.

I also came across an event at which Laurie Santos presented. CoSy, Cognitive Systems for Cognitive Assistants, "meeting of the minds workshop" in Paris '07. This organization seems to be primarily concerned with artificial intelligence. But it appears that Prof. Santos was invited to speak. It seems sometimes information and inspiration finds you!

Although I found some interesting things in the Clusty site I did have to filter out unrelated hits like the hits for another Laurie Santos, the "extreme dream coach". On the other hand it did lead to some things that I might not have found in an EBSCO or other similar database search.

I think I will go back to her published papers to analyze her citations.

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

beginning my scientist investigation

The scientist I have chosen for my exploration of information seeking behavior is Laurie Santos. She is a psychology professor at Yale University. On her Yale profile page she says "My current work explores what primates understand about physical objects and their motions, how primates spontaneously reason about different kinds of things (foods, artifacts, and animals), and whether or not non-human primates possess precursors to a theory of mind." Some of her more current studies are focused on the economic behavior of capuchin monkeys and lemurs and their similarities to humans, including some of the same illogical choices.

I started my search with a basic EBSCO Academic Search Complete. I wanted to get an idea of Prof. Santos' published writing. Surprisingly one of the things that I found most useful was not an article in scholarly journal but an interview in Discover magazine. In this interview she discusses her background, how she stumbled into psychology as an undergrad through an elective class, who she is working with now and she even mentions an experiment in risk aversion that seems to have inspired her. I had been wondering what led her to focus her experiments on primate economic behavior and in this article she explains how some new monkeys in her research lab were handing their orange peels to the keepers. She realized that they had been previously trained in a token economy. As the orange peels are not real tokens this must have made her wonder about their perception of economy.

I also went into the Yale site and read her profile page. Here she has a link to a personal web page. This in turn led me to her lab-page. Here she has posted short profiles for her graduate assistants and a list of other collaborators. Many of these are professors in related fields such as language and cognition. I think these collaborations would be a great source of information gathering and inspiration.

Next, I will try to find out what type of organizations she may belong to. I feel like I should know how to go about this but right now am at a bit of a loss so I'll probably ask some of the wonderful librarians I work with for some hints and post later.